Clarity at the heart of class certification

DeepValidation appends missing contact information, updates records that won't deliver, and validates every entry using proprietary data — turning dead-end lists into effective outreach.

Establish a defensible, audit-ready foundation for class certification arguments.

The Litigation Challenge

Class data rarely arrives clean. Fragmented records, duplicate identities, and inconsistent fields make it nearly impossible to define a class with the precision required for certification arguments, damages modeling, and judicial scrutiny.

The Covalynt Solution

We guide discovery toward the right data, enrich incomplete records with proprietary sources, and resolve every identity into a single, unified dataset, ensuring proper deduplication, built to withstand opposing experts and court review.

Discovery Guidance

Identify essential data fields, anticipate limitations, and align requests with case objectives.

Source-Level Enrichment

Enhance raw fields, fill contextual gaps, and elevate low-quality data to analytical readiness.

Permutation Inventorying

Map every data pattern, isolate edge cases, and surface gaps that impact class definition.

Cross-Temporal Record Linkage

Connect shifting identifiers, reconcile historical changes, and track entities reliably over time.

Data Structuring & Normalization

Standardize formats, repair inconsistencies, and create uniform inputs for downstream analysis.

Identity Resolution

Unify disparate records, dedupe overlapping entities, and establish a single source of truth.

Trusted in the highest-profile matters.

Our case experience:

Landsheft v. Apple Inc.

Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc.

Bartone, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al

Zeichner v. Nord Security Inc. et al

See the depth of our work >

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN RE: TELEXFREE SECURITIES LITIGATION

This document relates to:

plaintiffs,

All Cases

defendants.

NO. 4:14-md-02566-NMG

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

RON BROWN and MINKA GARMON,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

JBS USA FOOD COMPANY, et al.

defendants.

Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-02946-PAB-STV

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Scott T Varholak

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Phelps County, Missouri

Circuit Court

VERNITA E. MORRIS,

on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated,

plaintiffs,

EVIG, LLC d/b/a BALANCE OF NATURE,

defendants.

Case No.: 4:23-cv-00089-DN-PK

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WILLIAM DURLING, CHRIS BELLASPICA, TOM WOLFF, MICHAEL MORRIS, and RICHARD SOBOL,

for themselves and all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

PAPA JOHN’S INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

defendants.

Case No.: 7:16-cv-03592-CS

Judgement

Judge Wayne Andersen

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Henderson County

Kentucky Circuit Court

Whiting,

on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated,

plaintiffs,

YELLOW SOCIAL INTERACTIVE LTD.,

defendants.

Case No.: 2023-CI-00358

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Henderson County

Kentucky Circuit Court

WYLAND,

on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated,

plaintiffs,

WOOPLA, INC.,

defendants.

Case No.: 2023-CI-00356

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN RE: GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS (GLP-1 RAS)

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

plaintiffs,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS/ALL CASES

defendants.

Case 2:24-md-03094-KSM - MDL No. 3094

Civil Action

HON. KAREEN SPENCER MARSTON

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN RE: GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS (GLP-1 RAS)

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

plaintiffs,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS/ALL CASES

defendants.

Case 2:24-md-03094-KSM - MDL No. 3094

CIVIL ACTION

HON. KAREN SPENCER MARSTON

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

JORDAN ZEICHNER,

On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

plaintiffs,

NORDSEC LTD., NORDSEC B.V., NORDVPN S.A., NORD SECURITY INC., and TEFINCOM S.A. d/b/a NordVPN,

defendants.

Case No.: 3:24-cv-2462

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

EASTREN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ARMAND BRADLEY,

individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

BROOKHAVEN BOROUGH,

defendants.

Case No. 25-cv-155

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GINA BARTONE and MATEO CANU,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

META PLATFORMS, INC. and LUXOTTICA OF AMERICA, INC.,

defendants.

Case No. 3:26-cv-01897-EMC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF PETER TITTL’S FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE CASES

Hon. Edward M. Chen

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ERICA FRASCO, et al.

plaintiffs,

FLO HEALTH, INC. et al.

defendants.

Case No.: 3:21-cv-00757-JD

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

Judge James Donato

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Northern District of California

United States District Court

Peter Landshet

individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

APPLE INC.,

defendants.

Case No.: 5:25-cv-02668-NW

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

District Judge Noël Wise

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

New York Supreme Court

KALMAN ROSENFELD,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

AC2T, INC.,

defendants.

Case No.: 1:20-cv-04662-HG-PK

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Northern District of California

United States District Court

SANDRA McMILLION, JESSICA ADEKOYA, AND IGNACIO PEREZ,

on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated,

plaintiffs,

RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES,

defendants.

Case No.: 4:16-cv-03396-YGR JSC

Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Southern District of New York

United States District Court

MASHAYILA SAYERS, BRITTNEY TINKER, JENNIFER MONACHINO, KIMBERLY MULLINS, HILDA MICHELLE MURPHREE, and AMANDA JIMENEZ,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

ARTSANA USA, INC.

defendants.

Case No.: 7:21-cv-07933-VB

Hon. Vincent L. Briccetti

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

District of Colorado

United States District Court

RON BROWN, et al.,

plaintiffs,

JBS USA FOOD COMPANY, et al.,

defendants.

Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-02946-PAB-STV

Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

For the District of New Jersey

United States District Court

BRENDA NIXON,

plaintiffs,

GRANDE COSMETICS, LLC,

defendants.

Case No.: 1:22-cv-6639

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL AND PROVISIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDER

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Southern District of New York

United States District Court

Frank Pompilio, Rita Torres, Samantha Chuskas, Sherly Gattof, and Robby Harper,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

Boar’s Head Provisions Co. Inc.,

defendants.

Case No.: 7:24-cv-08220

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER

Hon. Philip M. Halpern

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

District of Maryland

United States District Court

JUDY JIEN, et al.,

plaintiffs,

PERDUE FARMS, INC., et al.,

defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:19-CV-2521-SAG

Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Northern District of California

United States District Court

ANTHONY BUSH,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION,

defendants.

Case No.: 3:20-cv-03268-LB

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

Hon. Laurel Beeler, United States Magistrate Judge

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Eastern District of New York

United States District Court

JENNIFER HASEMANN and DEBBIE HOTH,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

GERBER PRODUCTS CO., d/b/a Nestlé Nutrition, Nestlé Infant Nutrition, or Nestlé Nutrition North America,

defendants.

Case No.: 1:15-cv-02995-EK-JAM

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Judge Margo K. Brodie

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Southern District of New York

United States District Court

RAYMOND KESSLER, HARTEN CEHILL, LAZARO RODRIGUEZ, TERESA HERENDEEN, and BARBARA ABREU,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY,

defendants.

Case No.: 7:24-cv-00526-KMK

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER

Judge Kenneth M. Karas

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

For the Eastern District of North Carolina

United States District Court

Southern Division

DEBORAH RUFFIN,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

defendants.

Case No.: 7:23-cv-01660-BO-RN

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

For the Northern District of Illinois

United States District Court

IN RE BROILER CHICKEN ANTITRUST LITIGATION,

plaintiffs,

This Document Relates To: All Actions

defendants.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-08637

The Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

For the District of Columbia

United States District Court

ANDREW MACKMIN, et al.,

plaintiffs,

VISA INC., et al.,

defendants.

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01831-RJL

Richard J. Leon

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Northern District of California

United States District Court

San Francisco Division

CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,

defendants.

Case No.: 3:21-cv-01418-EMC

JOINT STATEMENT AND ORDER REGARDING CY PRES

Hon. Edward M. Chen

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Northern District of California

United States District Court

San Francisco Division

Michael Katz-Lacabe and Dr. Jennifer Golbeck,

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

plaintiffs,

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware,

defendants.

Case No.: 3:22-cv-04792-RS

JOINT STATUS REPORT RE SETTLEMENT

Hon. Richard Seeborg

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Northern District of California

United States District Court

San Jose Division

C.H., a minor, by and through their guardian ad litem NICHOLE HUBBARD, et al.,

plaintiffs,

GOOGLE LLC, et al.

defendants.

Case No.: 5:19-cv-07016-SVK

Hon. Susan van Keulen

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Northern District of California

United States District Court

San Jose Division

FUMIKO LOPEZ, and FUMIKO LOPEZ, as guardian of A.L., a minor,

plaintiffs,

APPLE INC.,

defendants.

Case No.: 4:19-cv-04577-JSW

Hon. Jeffrey S. White

Classresolution

Build a unified, audit-ready data foundation for certification.

Deepvalidation

Maximize notice reach with enriched, accurate contact data.

Learn more >

ClaimScore

Protect settlement funds with defensible, evidence-based fraud detection.

Learn more >